posted on 2021-08-30, 09:40authored byYing Jiang, Long Jin, Yi Qiang Fu, Wen Bo Liao
<p>Social group is associated with life-history traits and
can predict brain size variation in cooperative primates and some other mammal
groups, but such explicit relationships remain enigmatic in cooperatively
breeding birds. Indeed, some compositions of social group in cooperative
species (e.g., helper number and group size) would affect the fitness of
breeders by providing alloparental care. Here, we conducted comparative tests
of the relationship between the social group and both life-history traits and brain
size across 197 species of cooperatively breeding birds using phylogenetically
controlled comparative analyses. We did not find any correlations between
helper numbers and both life-history traits and brain size. However, we found
that maximum group size was positively associated with clutch size. Moreover,
average group size has positive associations with body mass and relative brain
size. Our findings suggest that helper numbers cannot promote variation in
relative brain size, while larger groups may predict bigger brains in
cooperatively breeding birds.</p>