posted on 2021-12-17, 10:24authored byFerdinand Kosak, Lisa Kugler, Sven Hilbert, Steffi Rettinger, Nils Bloom
<p>Previous literature suggested that different countries
and regions are associated with different temporal cultures resulting in
according scheduling styles: people in anglo-european countries supposedly plan
and structure their life predominantly according to the clock (clock time
orientation) while people in some other parts of the world are more prone to
live their lives in disregard of clock time but follow inner needs and/or the
structure given by the events that happen in their lives (event time orientation).
However, recent research shows that scheduling styles are also adaptive
responses to situational demands and event and clock timing are associated with
different experiences of control. Transferring these findings to a
cross-cultural setting, we investigated whether situational context is the
predominant factor explaining the application of different scheduling styles. To
this end, we used a mixed-methods approach with semi-structured interviews exploring
whether participants from Uganda and Germany (employees with fixed working
hours) differ in the level to which they structure their narratives of daily
routines of time associated with work primarily in reference to the clock while
recounting free time predominantly in reference to events and/or inner needs.
Our data, processed using qualitative content analysis, show this pattern for
the participants from both countries. Overall interviewees from Germany do not
refer to the clock more often than their Ugandan counterparts. This suggests that
individuals’ scheduling styles reflect intersituational adaptations to a given
demand for synchronization rather than being kind of a strong cultural imprint
on individuals.</p>