posted on 2020-04-10, 07:46authored byInês Freitas, Sylvain Ursenbacher, Konrad Mebert, Oleksandr Zinenko, Silke Schweiger, Wolfgang Wüster, José C. Brito, Jelka Crnobrnja-Isailović, Bálint Halpern, Soumia Fahd, Xavier Santos, Juan M. Pleguezuelos, Ulrich Joger, Nikolay Orlov, Edvárd Mizsei, Olivier Lourdais, Marco A. L. Zuffi, Alexandru Strugariu, Ștefan Remus Zamfirescu, Íñigo Martínez-Solano, Guillermo Velo-Antón, Antigoni Kaliontzopoulou, Fernando Martínez-Freiría
The designation of taxonomic units has important implications for the
understanding and conservation of biodiversity. Eurasian vipers are a
monophyletic group of viperid snakes (Serpentes, Viperinae), currently
comprising four genera (Daboia, Macrovipera, Montivipera and Vipera)
and up to 40 species. Taxonomic units have been described using a wide variety
of methods and criteria, and consequently, considerable controversy still
surrounds the validity of some currently listed species. In order to promote a
consensus- and evidence-based taxonomy of Eurasian vipers, we analysed
published mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences for this group to reconstruct
phylogenetic relationships among currently recognized viper species. We also
compiled information on external morphology to assess their morphological
distinctiveness. Phylogenetic inference based on mtDNA sequences shows
contrasting levels of divergence across genera and species and identifies
several instances of non-monophyly in described species. Nuclear DNA sequences
show extremely low levels of genetic variation, with a widespread pattern of
allele sharing among distant species, and even among genera. Revision of
morphological data shows that most species designations rely on scalation
traits that overlap extensively among species of the same genus. Based on our
combined assessment, we recognize 15 taxa as valid species, three taxa which
likely represent species complexes, 17 taxa of doubtful validity as species,
and five taxa for which species status is maintained but further research is highly recommended
to assess taxonomic arrangements. We stress the need to implement
integrative taxonomic approaches for the recognition of evidence-based
taxonomic units in Eurasian vipers.