posted on 2020-06-15, 06:43authored byFrancesca Di Cicco, Lisa Wiersma, Maarten Wijntjes, Sylvia Pont
<p>Painters
mastered replicating the regularities of the visual patterns that we use to infer different
materials and their properties, via meticulous observation of the way light
reveals the world’s textures. The convincing depiction of bunches of grapes is
particularly interesting. A convincing portrayal of grapes requires a balanced
combination of different material properties, such as glossiness, translucency
and bloom, as we learn from the 17th-century pictorial recipe by Willem Beurs. These
material properties, together with three-dimensionality and convincingness, were
rated in experiment 1 on 17th-century paintings, and in experiment 2 on optical
mixtures of layers derived from a reconstruction of one of the 17th-century
paintings, made following Beurs’s recipe. In experiment 3 only convincingness
was rated, using again the 17th-century paintings. With a multiple linear regression,
we found glossiness, translucency and bloom not to be good predictors of convincingness
of the 17th-century paintings, but they were for the reconstruction. Overall,
convincingness was judged consistently, showing that people agreed on its
meaning. However, the agreement was higher when the material properties
indicated by Beurs were also rated (experiment 1) than if not (experiment 3), suggesting
that these properties are associated with what makes grapes look convincing. The
17th-century workshop practices showed more variability than standardization of
grapes, as different combinations of the material properties could lead to a
highly convincing representation. Beurs’s recipe provides a list of all the
possible optical interactions of grapes, and the economic yet effective image
cues to render them.</p>