Morphology is a poor predictor of interspecific admixture ‒ the case of two naturally hybridizing newts Lissotriton montandoni and Lissotriton vulgaris (Caudata: Salamandridae)
posted on 2020-06-02, 08:14authored byMarta E. Niedzicka, Bartosz M. Głowacki, Piotr Zieliński, Wiesław Babik
Compared to the parental species,
interspecific hybrids often show, intermediate phenotypes which can affect
their fitness directly and/or their attractiveness to potential mates. Lissotriton
montandoni and Lissotriton vulgaris hybridize across
their parapatric range along the Carpathian mountains. Hybrids are rare in
natural hybrid zones, which may be related to strong assortative mating in
parental species. In the present study, we investigated morphological male
species-specific traits and their differentiation between both parental species
and first generation of interspecific hybrids (F1), considering morphological
variation between two L. vulgaris
subspecies co-occurring with L. montandoni
in nature: L. v. vulgaris and L. v. ampelensis. Male morphology of
each group was assessed and compared based on species-specific and sexual
secondary traits, selected based on the literature review. We confirmed that F1
hybrids of L. v. vulgaris and L. montandoni have
an intermediate morphology between parental species. However, when
morphological traits were compared with the level of genetic admixture of
individuals in natural hybrid zones, we discovered that even early generations
hybrids (i.e. F1 and/or F2 generation) can be similar to the parental species (especially L.
v. ampelensis). As even early generations hybrids can be
morphologically undistinguishable from L.
v. ampelensis, sexual attractiveness of hybrids may be potentially less
affected in direction of L. v. ampelensis
backcrossing. Summarizing, morphology, especially
morphology of male secondary sexual traits is not a reliable tool for the
estimation of genetic admixture of an individual in natural populations within
the hybrid zone.